Ads
related to: pros and cons of selection strategies in leadership development- Download Brochures
Receive our portfolio
to explore learning opportunities
- Earn a Certificate
Receive a customizable certificate
in business excellence
- Exec. Development Program
Refine your leadership skills to
transform your organization
- For Individuals
Gain actionable insight
you need today
- Download Brochures
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Vroom–Yetton contingency model is a situational leadership theory of industrial and organizational psychology developed by Victor Vroom, in collaboration with Philip Yetton (1973) and later with Arthur Jago (1988). The situational theory argues the best style of leadership is contingent to the situation.
Democratic leadership, also known as participative leadership, is a type of leadership style in which members of the group take a more participative role in the decision-making process. Researchers have found that this leadership style is usually one of the most effective and leads to higher productivity, better contributions from group members ...
Strategic leadership balances a focused analytical perspective with the human dimension of strategy making (as documented by the Park Li Group). It is important to engage the entire business in a strategic dialogue in order to lay the foundation for building winning organizations that can define, commit, adjust and adapt their strategy quickly ...
4 counterintuitive leadership strategies top CEOs swear by, according to 20 years of data. Ruth Umoh. July 15, 2024 at 6:39 AM. Photograph by Mackenzie Stroh.
The Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior (GLOBE) Project is an example of cross-cultural leadership research, as it aimed to compare leadership ideals in various countries and regions. However, it looked at leaders operating within their own culture, rather than across culture. [ 146 ]
Leader development is described as one aspect of the broader process of leadership development (McCauley et al., 2010). Leadership development is defined as the expansion of a group's capacity to produce direction, alignment, and commitment (McCauley et al.), in contrast to leader development which is the expansion of a one's ability to be effective in leadership roles and processes.