Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Whether a case departs "from prior practice without violating the rule of stare decisis"; Whether a case establishes "a test or a measurable standard that can be applied by courts in future decisions." Each case which fits within one of these categories has traditionally been deemed a likely candidate for being labeled a "landmark" decision.
This case featured the first example of judicial review by the Supreme Court. Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. 199 (1796) A section of the Treaty of Paris supersedes an otherwise valid Virginia statute under the Supremacy Clause. This case featured the first example of judicial nullification of a state law. Fletcher v.
"Leading case" is commonly used in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth jurisdictions instead of "landmark case", as used in the United States. [1] [2] In Commonwealth countries, a reported decision is said to be a leading decision when it has come to be generally regarded as settling the law of the question involved.
Roe v. Wade, the landmark case that made access to legal abortion a constitutional right in the United States, has been overturned by the Supreme Court, disrupting nearly 50 years of precedent ...
definition of religion for a military draft exemption Swain v. Alabama: 380 U.S. 202 (1965) use of struck jury: Hanna v. Plumer: 380 U.S. 460 (1965) interpretation of the Erie doctrine, Civil Procedure: Dombrowski v. Pfister: 380 U.S. 479 (1965) federal injunction against state criminal trial for subversion: Harman v. Forssenius: 380 U.S. 528 ...
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), [1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protected a right to have an abortion.
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to use contraceptives without government restriction. [1]
A case may alternatively come before the court as a direct appeal from a three-judge federal district court. [201] The party that petitions the court for review is the petitioner and the non-mover is the respondent. Case names before the court are styled petitioner v. respondent, regardless of which party initiated the lawsuit in the trial court.