Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
State of Hawai'i v. Christopher L. Wilson is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Hawaii. [1]It concluded that "there is no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public" and that "as the world turns, it makes no sense for contemporary society to pledge allegiance to the founding era’s culture, realities, laws, and understanding of the [American] Constitution."
From January 15, 1848, to December 6, 1852, it was known as the Superior Court of the Kingdom of Hawaii. From December 6, 1852, to January 17, 1893, it was known as the Supreme Court of the Kingdom of Hawaii. From January 17, 1893, to July 4, 1898, it was known as the Supreme Court of the Republic of Hawaii.
Pages in category "Justices of the Supreme Court of Hawaii" The following 25 pages are in this category, out of 25 total. This list may not reflect recent changes .
The Supreme Court of Hawaii is the highest court of the State of Hawaii in the United States. Its decisions are binding on all other courts of the Hawaii State Judiciary . The principal purpose of the Supreme Court is to review the decisions of the trial courts in which appeals have been granted.
The Hawaii State Supreme Court is the state supreme court. It is the high court of the state and makes binding decisions over appeals from the lower courts upon transfer from the Intermediate Court of Appeals and cases eligible to be heard directly by the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court. It is also responsible for court rules, licensing and disciplining ...
The Hawaii Supreme Court, in its ruling Thursday, said thousands of Native Hawaiians have waited to lease land pledged to them under the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1920, but Hawaii, both as ...
Chief justices of the Hawaiian Kingdom (1 C, 8 P) Pages in category "Chief justices of the Supreme Court of Hawaii" The following 6 pages are in this category, out of 6 total.
The U.S. Supreme Court, the Hawaiian court wrote, "distorts and cherry-picks historical evidence" and "discards historical facts that don't fit" to support its emphasis on an individual right.