Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
An example of a reflexive relation is the relation "is equal to" on the set of real numbers, since every real number is equal to itself. A reflexive relation is said to have the reflexive property or is said to possess reflexivity. Along with symmetry and transitivity, reflexivity is one of three properties defining equivalence relations.
Euclidean geometry is a mathematical system attributed to ancient Greek mathematician Euclid, ... (reflexive property). The whole is greater than the part.
The operation-application property was also stated in Peano's Arithmetices principia, [16] however, it had been common practice in algebra since at least Diophantus (c. 250 AD). [19] The substitution property is generally attributed to Gottfried Leibniz (c. 1686), and often called Leibniz Law. [13] [20]
In mathematics, an equivalence relation is a binary relation that is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. The equipollence relation between line segments in geometry is a common example of an equivalence relation. A simpler example is equality. Any number is equal to itself (reflexive).
However, there is a formula for finding the number of relations that are simultaneously reflexive, symmetric, and transitive – in other words, equivalence relations – (sequence A000110 in the OEIS), those that are symmetric and transitive, those that are symmetric, transitive, and antisymmetric, and those that are total, transitive, and ...
A relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. It is also a relation that is symmetric, transitive, and serial, since these properties imply reflexivity. Orderings: Partial order A relation that is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive. Strict partial order A relation that is irreflexive, asymmetric, and transitive. Total order
In mathematics, the Milman–Pettis theorem states that every uniformly convex Banach space is reflexive. The theorem was proved independently by D. Milman (1938) and B. J. Pettis (1939). S. Kakutani gave a different proof in 1939, and John R. Ringrose published a shorter proof in 1959.
A Buekenhout geometry consists of a set X whose elements are called "varieties", with a symmetric, reflexive relation on X called "incidence", together with a function τ called the "type map" from X to a set Δ whose elements are called "types" and whose size is called the "rank". Two distinct varieties of the same type cannot be incident.