Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
All Runge–Kutta methods mentioned up to now are explicit methods. Explicit Runge–Kutta methods are generally unsuitable for the solution of stiff equations because their region of absolute stability is small; in particular, it is bounded. [25] This issue is especially important in the solution of partial differential equations.
Diagonally Implicit Runge–Kutta (DIRK) formulae have been widely used for the numerical solution of stiff initial value problems; [6] the advantage of this approach is that here the solution may be found sequentially as opposed to simultaneously.
"New high-order Runge-Kutta formulas with step size control for systems of first and second-order differential equations". Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik . 44 (S1): T17 – T29 .
Explicit examples from the linear multistep family include the Adams–Bashforth methods, and any Runge–Kutta method with a lower diagonal Butcher tableau is explicit. A loose rule of thumb dictates that stiff differential equations require the use of implicit schemes, whereas non-stiff problems can be solved more efficiently with explicit ...
For simplicity, the following example uses the simplest integration method, the Euler method; in practice, higher-order methods such as Runge–Kutta methods are preferred due to their superior convergence and stability properties. Consider the initial value problem ′ = (, ()), =
A newer Runge—Kutta scheme also of strong order 1 straightforwardly reduces to the improved Euler scheme for deterministic ODEs. [2] Consider the vector stochastic process () that satisfies the general Ito SDE = (,) + (,), where drift and volatility are sufficiently smooth functions of their arguments.
Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations, such as Runge–Kutta methods, can be applied to the restated problem and thus be used to evaluate the integral. For instance, the standard fourth-order Runge–Kutta method applied to the differential equation yields Simpson's rule from above.
The idea of Richardson extrapolation is to consider a numerical calculation whose accuracy depends on the used stepsize h as an (unknown) analytic function of the stepsize h, performing the numerical calculation with various values of h, fitting a (chosen) analytic function to the resulting points, and then evaluating the fitting function for h ...