Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Government and binding theory; I. ... This page was last edited on 18 November 2023, at 10:42 ...
The following three subsections consider the binding domains that are relevant for the distribution of pronouns and nouns in English. The discussion follows the outline provided by the traditional binding theory (see below), which divides nominals into three basic categories: reflexive and reciprocal pronouns, personal pronouns, and nouns (common and proper).
Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures (LGB) is a book by the linguist Noam Chomsky, published in 1981. It is based on the lectures Chomsky gave at the GLOW conference and workshop held at the Scuola Normale Superiore in Pisa, Italy, in 1979. In this book, Chomsky presented his government and binding theory of syntax.
Government and binding (GB, GBT) is a theory of syntax and a phrase structure grammar in the tradition of transformational grammar developed principally by Noam Chomsky in the 1980s. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] This theory is a radical revision of his earlier theories [ 4 ] [ 5 ] [ 6 ] and was later revised in The Minimalist Program (1995) [ 7 ] and ...
In government and binding theory this is known as proper government. Proper government occurs either if the empty position is governed by a lexical category (especially if it is not a subject) (theta-government) or if it is coindexed with a maximal projection which governs it (antecedent-government). The ECP has been revised many times and is ...
Subjacency is a general syntactic locality constraint on movement.It specifies restrictions placed on movement and regards it as a strictly local process. This term was first defined by Noam Chomsky in 1973 and constitutes the main concept of the Government and Binding Theory.
Principles and parameters as a grammar framework is also known as government and binding theory. That is, the two terms principles and parameters and government and binding refer to the same school in the generative tradition of phrase structure grammars (as opposed to dependency grammars ).
The local domain is the smallest XP containing a DP, in order to satisfy Binding Theory, the DP must c-command the anaphor and have a subject. [1] Therefore, the antecedent must be in the same clause that contains the anaphor if it is to abide to Binding Theory. An anaphor is considered to be free when it is not c-commanded or co-indexed. [5]