Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The complexity of an elementary function is equivalent to that of its inverse, since all elementary functions are analytic and hence invertible by means of Newton's method. In particular, if either exp {\displaystyle \exp } or log {\displaystyle \log } in the complex domain can be computed with some complexity, then that complexity is ...
Calculating the inverse matrix once, and storing it to apply at each iteration is of complexity O(n 3) + k O(n 2). Storing an LU decomposition of ( A − μ I ) {\displaystyle (A-\mu I)} and using forward and back substitution to solve the system of equations at each iteration is also of complexity O ( n 3 ) + k O ( n 2 ).
The group inverse can be defined, equivalently, by the properties AA # A = A, A # AA # = A #, and AA # = A # A. A projection matrix P, defined as a matrix such that P 2 = P, has index 1 (or 0) and has Drazin inverse P D = P. If A is a nilpotent matrix (for example a shift matrix), then = The hyper-power sequence is
A variant of Gaussian elimination called Gauss–Jordan elimination can be used for finding the inverse of a matrix, if it exists. If A is an n × n square matrix, then one can use row reduction to compute its inverse matrix, if it exists. First, the n × n identity matrix is augmented to the right of A, forming an n × 2n block matrix [A | I]
Condition numbers can also be defined for nonlinear functions, and can be computed using calculus.The condition number varies with the point; in some cases one can use the maximum (or supremum) condition number over the domain of the function or domain of the question as an overall condition number, while in other cases the condition number at a particular point is of more interest.
A common case is finding the inverse of a low-rank update A + UCV of A (where U only has a few columns and V only a few rows), or finding an approximation of the inverse of the matrix A + B where the matrix B can be approximated by a low-rank matrix UCV, for example using the singular value decomposition.
In mathematics, and in particular linear algebra, the Moore–Penrose inverse + of a matrix , often called the pseudoinverse, is the most widely known generalization of the inverse matrix. [1] It was independently described by E. H. Moore in 1920, [2] Arne Bjerhammar in 1951, [3] and Roger Penrose in 1955. [4]
Although an explicit inverse is not necessary to estimate the vector of unknowns, it is the easiest way to estimate their accuracy and os found in the diagonal of a matrix inverse (the posterior covariance matrix of the vector of unknowns). However, faster algorithms to compute only the diagonal entries of a matrix inverse are known in many cases.