Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A typical book can be printed with 10 6 zeros (around 400 pages with 50 lines per page and 50 zeros per line). Therefore, it requires 10 94 such books to print all the zeros of a googolplex (that is, printing a googol zeros). [4] If each book had a mass of 100 grams, all of them would have a total mass of 10 93 kilograms.
Both are wrong. A googolplex is actually a googol times a googol. That means its equal to 10 to the power of 200 or 1 followed by 200 zeros. Look it up. Skittles 16:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 10 to the power of googol and 1 followed by googol zeroes is the same thing. 10^1 = 1 followed by 1 zero. 10^2 is 1 followed by 2 zeroes, etc.
The decay time for a supermassive black hole of roughly 1 galaxy-mass (10 11 solar masses) due to Hawking radiation is on the order of 10 100 years. [7] Therefore, the heat death of an expanding universe is lower-bounded to occur at least one googol years in the future. A googol is considerably smaller than a centillion. [8]
This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You ...
⋮ g 1 = n th tower: 3↑3↑3↑3↑3↑3↑3↑...↑3 (number of 3s is given by the n − 1 th tower) where the number of 3s in each successive tower is given by the tower just before it. The result of calculating the third tower is the value of n, the number of towers for g 1.
In mathematics, more specifically in the field of analytic number theory, a Landau–Siegel zero or simply Siegel zero, also known as exceptional zero [1]), named after Edmund Landau and Carl Ludwig Siegel, is a type of potential counterexample to the generalized Riemann hypothesis, on the zeros of Dirichlet L-functions associated to quadratic number fields.
Upper bounds on Skewes's number Year near x # of complex zeros used by 2000: 1.39822 × 10 316: 10 6: Bays and Hudson 2010: 1.39801 × 10 316: 10 7: Chao and Plymen 2010: 1.397166 × 10 316: 2.2 × 10 7: Saouter and Demichel 2011: 1.397162 × 10 316: 2.0 × 10 11: Stoll and Demichel
Jensen's formula can be used to estimate the number of zeros of an analytic function in a circle. Namely, if is a function analytic in a disk of radius centered at and if | | is bounded by on the boundary of that disk, then the number of zeros of in a circle of radius < centered at the same point does not exceed