Ad
related to: how to talk about your achievements examples essay pdf printablesmartholidayshopping.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The situation, task, action, result (STAR) format is a technique [1] used by interviewers to gather all the relevant information about a specific capability that the job requires.
For example, you may know something to be true because you have witnessed it. However, on Wikipedia, article content must be verifiable in reliable sources. Another example is an article created entirely to promote a certain product. Even if all the claims in the article are true, promotional articles are not permitted.
For example: Making a speech which nails the Government's corruption as Robin Cook did in 1997, is an achievement. Making a speech in favour of Motherhood, Apple Pie and Fluffy Bunnies is an "achievement" and actually achieves nothing other than as a promotional tool. Wikipedia biographies are for those with achievements, not "achievements".
Essays often appear in magazines, especially magazines with an intellectual bent, such as The Atlantic and Harpers. Magazine and newspaper essays use many of the essay types described in the section on forms and styles (e.g., descriptive essays, narrative essays, etc.). Some newspapers also print essays in the op-ed section.
An admissions or application essay, sometimes also called a personal statement or a statement of purpose, is an essay or other written statement written by an applicant, often a prospective student applying to some college, university, or graduate school. The application essay is a common part of the university and college admissions process.
The fact that the only "sources" about your band are your webpage, your Myspace page, your brother's blog, and your mom's work newsletter, should be one indication that your band's "notability" only extends to your immediate family and friends. However, if you must know, here are some ways to tell if your article is worth mentioning on Wikipedia.
Experienced editors not involved with the cause in question may suspect the new user of having a close connection with it. Such editors should respond carefully, to ensure that by alleging or deciding that the group is not "notable" by Wikipedia's standards, they do not suggest to the new user that the cause for which the group works is unimportant.
It depends whether you have a relationship with the subject or not. If you don't, then, as far as Wikipedia is concerned, you can only wait. You may have started the article out of admiration for the subject, but if you are the only person who has noticed yet, then the time is not right for a Wikipedia article – even a brilliant one.