Ads
related to: c you at the movies
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
On-screen graphic from Roger Ebert & the Movies. Ebert continued the show with a series of guest critics. [28] [29] Originally retaining the Siskel & Ebert title, the program was renamed Roger Ebert & the Movies on the weekend of September 4–5, 1999, after Siskel's death. The guests matched wits with Ebert and tested their chemistry.
At the Movies (also known as At the Movies with Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert) is an American movie review television program that aired from 1982 to 1990. It was produced by Tribune Entertainment and was created by Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert when they left their show Sneak Previews, which they began on Chicago's PBS station, WTTW, in 1975.
Ebert Presents: At the Movies is a weekly, nationally syndicated movie review television program produced by film critic Roger Ebert and his wife, Chaz Ebert.The program aired on public television stations in the United States through American Public Television from January 21 to December 30, 2011.
Bing Crosby and too much free time: How the tradition got its start. Christmas Day, and really the week entirely, is especially suited for going to the movies, said Alicia Kozma, director of the ...
A national pastime. On a recent Sunday morning here in South Minneapolis, a decades-long father-son tradition continued at the Riverview Theater, a single-screen cinema nestled among century-old ...
At the Movies (1982 TV program), an American program, originally known as At the Movies with Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert. At the Movies (1986 TV program), a successor/competitor program (1986–2010) to the original, which was also known as Siskel & Ebert & the Movies; Ebert Presents: At the Movies, a successor program (2011)
Image credits: RedWestern #8. Dana Scully. Even caused an uptic of women in STEM studies. Caira_Ru: I’m very biased, because I was at a pretty critical age in my own development when Scully and ...
Gene Siskel particularly singled out this aspect, saying, "If you're going to go through the trouble of putting us in a monster movie, why don't you at least take the advantage of having the monster either eat or squash us?" [38] Ebert gave the film one-and-a-half stars out of four. [39] Siskel placed the film on his list of the worst films of ...