Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
For example, if the functional form of the model does not match the data, R 2 can be high despite a poor model fit. Anscombe's quartet consists of four example data sets with similarly high R 2 values, but data that sometimes clearly does not fit the regression line. Instead, the data sets include outliers, high-leverage points, or non-linearities.
Statistical conclusion validity is the degree to which conclusions about the relationship among variables based on the data are correct or 'reasonable'. This began as being solely about whether the statistical conclusion about the relationship of the variables was correct, but now there is a movement towards moving to 'reasonable' conclusions ...
Linear errors-in-variables models were studied first, probably because linear models were so widely used and they are easier than non-linear ones. Unlike standard least squares regression (OLS), extending errors in variables regression (EiV) from the simple to the multivariable case is not straightforward, unless one treats all variables in the same way i.e. assume equal reliability.
The three causes are these: lack of data; lack of control of the input variables; uncertainty about the underlying probability distributions and correlations. The usual methods for dealing with difficulties in validation include the following: checking the assumptions made in constructing the model; examining the available data and related ...
That is to say, when one or more values are missing for a case, most statistical packages default to discarding any case that has a missing value, which may introduce bias or affect the representativeness of the results. Imputation preserves all cases by replacing missing data with an estimated value based on other available information.
The theorem states that any estimator that is unbiased for a given unknown quantity and that depends on the data only through a complete, sufficient statistic is the unique best unbiased estimator of that quantity. The Lehmann–Scheffé theorem is named after Erich Leo Lehmann and Henry Scheffé, given their two early papers. [2] [3]
An implication of the theorem is that when using likelihood-based inference, two sets of data yielding the same value for the sufficient statistic T(X) will always yield the same inferences about θ. By the factorization criterion, the likelihood's dependence on θ is only in conjunction with T ( X ).
This example will show that, in a sample X 1, X 2 of size 2 from a normal distribution with known variance, the statistic X 1 + X 2 is complete and sufficient. Suppose X 1, X 2 are independent, identically distributed random variables, normally distributed with expectation θ and variance 1. The sum