When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Universal grammar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_grammar

    Universal grammar (UG), in modern linguistics, is the theory of the innate biological component of the language faculty, usually credited to Noam Chomsky. The basic postulate of UG is that there are innate constraints on what the grammar of a possible human language could be.

  3. Generative grammar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_grammar

    Generative grammar began in the late 1950s with the work of Noam Chomsky, having roots in earlier approaches such as structural linguistics. The earliest version of Chomsky's model was called Transformational grammar, with subsequent iterations known as Government and binding theory and the Minimalist program.

  4. Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An Introduction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky's_Universal_Grammar...

    The universal grammar is a study of "I-language" (internalized language), not "E-language" (externalized language). Cook distinguishes Chomsky's linguistic universals from implicational universals. [1] On first-language acquisition (FLA), Cook presents Chomsky's nativist perspective—that humans are born with innate knowledge of natural language.

  5. Innateness hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innateness_hypothesis

    The term universal grammar refers to the set of constraints on what a possible human language could be. Within approaches that accept universal grammar, language acquisition is viewed as a process of using sensory input to filter through the set of possible grammars that conform to UG. [27] [28]

  6. Minimalist program - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimalist_program

    Chomsky (2013) suggests an even simpler LA based on the notion of "prominence". In this version of the LA, the label is independently determined by whichever properties of UG (universal grammar) allow us to identify a "prominent Lexical Item. Due to this revision, it becomes questionable whether Merge plays any role at all in labelling ...

  7. Linguistic universal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_universal

    With regards to Chomsky's universal grammar, these linguists claim that the explanation of the structure and rules applied to UG are either false due to a lack of detail into the various constructions used when creating or interpreting a grammatical sentence, or that the theory is unfalsifiable due to the vague and oversimplified assertions ...

  8. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspects_of_the_Theory_of...

    In Chomsky's opinion, in order for a linguistic theory to be justified on "internal grounds" and to achieve "explanatory adequacy", it has to show how a child's brain, when exposed to primary linguistic data, uses special innate abilities or strategies (described as a set of principles called "Universal Grammar") and selects the correct grammar ...

  9. Deep structure and surface structure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_structure_and_surface...

    In common usage, the term is often used as a synonym for universal grammar—the constraints which Chomsky claims govern the overall forms of linguistic expression available to the human species. This is probably due to the importance of deep structure in Chomsky's earlier work on universal grammar, though his concept of universal grammar is ...