Ads
related to: city of glendale court records los angeles a r v g and r 2003 ukhl 50- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- Public Court Records
checksecrets.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
reviewpublicrecords.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In addition, computer software is not considered a public record, while data and statistics collected (whether collected knowingly or unknowingly) by a government authority whose powers derive from the laws of California are public records (such as license plate reader images) pursuant to EFF & ACLU of Southern California v. Los Angeles Police ...
City of Los Angeles v. Patel, 576 U.S. 409 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Los Angeles law, Municipal Code § 41.49, requiring hotel operators to retain records about guests for a 90-day period, is facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it does not allow for pre-compliance review.
R v G [a] [2003] is an English criminal law ruling on reckless damage, for which various offences it held that the prosecution must show a defendant subjectively appreciated a particular risk existing or going to exist to the health or property of another, and the damaging consequence, but carried on in the circumstances known to him unreasonably taking the risk.
City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the plaintiff, Adolph Lyons, lacked standing to challenge the Los Angeles city police department's use of chokeholds.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304 (1987), was a 6–3 decision of the United States Supreme Court.The court held that the complete destruction of the value of property constituted a "taking" under the Fifth Amendment even if that taking was temporary and the property was later restored.
Ad
related to: city of glendale court records los angeles a r v g and r 2003 ukhl 50