Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
This phenomenon was first identified in a 1977 study at Villanova University and Temple University. [2] [3] When truth is assessed, people rely on whether the information is in line with their understanding or if it feels familiar. The first condition is logical, as people compare new information with what they already know to be true.
Splitting, also called binary thinking, dichotomous thinking, black-and-white thinking, all-or-nothing thinking, or thinking in extremes, is the failure in a person's thinking to bring together the dichotomy of both perceived positive and negative qualities of something into a cohesive, realistic whole.
The tendency for people of one race to have difficulty identifying members of a race other than their own. Egocentric bias: Recalling the past in a self-serving manner, e.g., remembering one's exam grades as being better than they were, or remembering a caught fish as bigger than it really was. Euphoric recall
think of a good chess move (if you're a chess master) understand simple sentences; System 2: Slow, effortful, infrequent, logical, calculating, conscious. Examples of things system 2 can do: prepare yourself for the start of a sprint; direct your attention towards the clowns at the circus; direct your attention towards someone at a loud party
A recent study published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General finds that simply sitting and thinking — allowing your mind to wander — enhances creativity and the ability to ...
Some researchers include a metacognitive component in their definition. In this view, the Dunning–Kruger effect is the thesis that those who are incompetent in a given area tend to be ignorant of their incompetence, i.e., they lack the metacognitive ability to become aware of their incompetence.
Here's what happens to your body every 10 minutes as you're consuming the 'good' ol' fizzy stuff: The key take away from this is that as you consume soda and it goes through your body, essential ...
The term "curse of knowledge" was coined in a 1989 Journal of Political Economy article by economists Colin Camerer, George Loewenstein, and Martin Weber.The aim of their research was to counter the "conventional assumptions in such (economic) analyses of asymmetric information in that better-informed agents can accurately anticipate the judgement of less-informed agents".