Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Vinson Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1946 to 1953, when Fred M. Vinson served as Chief Justice of the United States.Vinson succeeded Harlan F. Stone as Chief Justice after the latter's death, and Vinson served as Chief Justice until his death, at which point Earl Warren was nominated and confirmed to succeed Vinson.
American Power and Light Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 329 U.S. 90 (1946), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Commerce Clause allows the federal government to dissolve a public utility company that is not serving the local community properly. [1] [2]
330 U.S. 1 (1947) First Amendment, establishment of religion U.S. Public Workers v. Mitchell: 330 U.S. 75 (1947) Hatch Act of 1940 United States v. United Mine Workers: 330 U.S. 258 (1947) injunction against a strike action: Crane v. Commissioner: 331 U.S. 1 (1947) determination of basis of property secured by a nonrecourse mortgage: Adamson v ...
It includes United States Supreme Court cases that can also be found in the parent category, or in diffusing subcategories of the parent. Cases of the Supreme Court of the United States decided during the tenure of Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson (1946–53).
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946), is a decision by the US Supreme Court that held that preliminary work activities, if controlled by the employer and performed entirely for the employer's benefit, are properly included as working time under Fair Labor Standards Act. [1]
That old, dilapidated building on Henderson Street near I-30 will get new life when a developer starts work this month. Check out these renderings. This is how historic Fort Worth Public Market ...
The Tax Court disagreed with the Commissioner and found it to be an ordinary business loss. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the Tax Court and held it to be a capital loss. [2] The U.S. Supreme Court agreed with the Second Circuit and held that it was a capital loss. [1]
The trial judge had imposed the maximum $5,000 plus $2,000 in attorneys fees. The majority upheld that ruling because the statute vested broad discretion to the courts based on the evidence and specifics of each case. [1] Even though the judge made comments that could be perceived as prejudicial, the ruling was sound.