When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Insanity defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_defense

    Legal definitions of insanity or mental disorder are varied, and include the M'Naghten Rule, the Durham rule, the 1953 British Royal Commission on Capital Punishment report, the ALI rule (American Legal Institute Model Penal Code rule), and other provisions, often relating to a lack of mens rea ("guilty mind").

  3. M'Naghten rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M'Naghten_rules

    The House of Lords delivered the following exposition of the rules: . the jurors ought to be told in all cases that every man is to be presumed to be sane, and to possess a sufficient degree of reason to be responsible for his crimes, until the contrary be proved to their satisfaction; and that to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the ...

  4. United States federal laws governing defendants with mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_laws...

    Per Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2, a defendant intending to pursue an insanity defense must timely notify an attorney for the government in writing. The government then has a right to have the court order a psychiatric or psychological examination.

  5. Insanity defense withdrawn, man pleads guilty to killing his ...

    www.aol.com/insanity-defense-withdrawn-man...

    On Feb 20, defense lawyer Trey Keith, withdrew the motion to file an insanity defense. Instead, Thomas accepted a deal Friday morning from the Taylor County District Attorney's Office.

  6. Attorneys preserve the right to invoke insanity plea for man ...

    www.aol.com/news/attorneys-preserve-invoke...

    The 34-year-old ex-convict Joseph Eaton entered pleas of both not guilty and not criminally responsible, leaving him the option of an insanity defense against charges including four counts of murder.

  7. Durham v. United States (1954) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durham_v._United_States_(1954)

    Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954), [1] is a criminal case articulating what became known as the Durham rule for juries to find a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity: "an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect."

  8. Jury rejects insanity defense for man convicted of hate crime ...

    www.aol.com/jury-rejects-insanity-defense-man...

    Because Scolman entered a plea of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect — commonly referred to as an insanity plea — a second phase of the trial began Wednesday, to determine his ...

  9. Kahler v. Kansas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahler_v._Kansas

    The insanity defense is a traditional affirmative defense that dates at least back to English common law.The codification of the M'Naghten rules, which have been referenced in one form or another in US law as well as UK law, indicates that someone may be found not guilty of a crime because of a mental condition which prevents them from either controlling their actions or from knowing whether ...