When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celotex_Corp._v._Catrett

    Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.Written by Associate Justice William Rehnquist, the decision of the Court held that a party moving for summary judgment need show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case.

  3. NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLRB_v._Jones_&_Laughlin...

    National Labor Relations Board v Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, 301 U.S. 1 (1937), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, also known as the Wagner Act.

  4. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babbitt_v._Sweet_Home...

    The case demonstrated the significance of habitat modification under the ESA and is the first case that defined the word harm under the definition of take, which applies to actions that have direct contact, minimal, or unforeseeable effects to endangered species. [2] The definition of harm includes changes in habitat that affect endangered species.

  5. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A&M_Records,_Inc._v...

    In some cases, wholesale copying of a work may be allowable, with time shifting as an example. Widespread wholesale transfer of plaintiffs' music negatively affected the market for CD sales and jeopardized the record industry's future in digital markets.

  6. Ashcroft v. Iqbal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Iqbal

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that plaintiffs must present a "plausible" cause of action. Alongside Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (and together known as Twiqbal), Iqbal raised the threshold which plaintiffs needed to meet.

  7. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Atlantic_Corp._v._Twombly

    Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving antitrust law and civil procedure.Authored by Justice David Souter, it established that parallel conduct, absent evidence of agreement, is insufficient to sustain an antitrust action under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

  8. Glik v. Cunniffe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glik_v._Cunniffe

    Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights.

  9. Moore v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._Regents_of_the...

    John Moore first visited UCLA Medical Center on October 5, 1976, after he was diagnosed with hairy cell leukemia.Physician and cancer researcher David Golde took samples of Moore's blood, bone marrow, and other bodily fluids to confirm the diagnosis and recommended a splenectomy because of the potentially fatal amount of swelling in Moore's spleen. [3]