Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The following Comparison of Prolog implementations provides a reference for the relative feature sets and performance of different implementations of the Prolog computer programming language. A comprehensive discussion of the most significant Prolog systems is presented in an article published in the 50-years of Prolog anniversary issue of the ...
Common Lisp: General Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Extensible syntax, Array-oriented, syntactic macros, multiple dispatch, concurrent Yes 1994, ANSI COMAL 80 Education Yes No No Yes No No No Crystal: General purpose Yes Yes [21] Yes Yes Yes [22] No Concurrent [23] No Curry: Application No No Yes No Yes No lazy evaluation, non-determinism
Lisp originally had very few control structures, but many more were added during the language's evolution. (Lisp's original conditional operator, cond, is the precursor to later if-then-else structures.) Programmers in the Scheme dialect often express loops using tail recursion. Scheme's commonality in academic computer science has led some ...
Poplog supports incrementally compiled versions of Common Lisp, POP-11, Prolog, and Standard ML. A separate package implemented by Robin Popplestone supports a version of Scheme . Poplog has been used both for academic research and teaching in artificial intelligence and also to develop several commercial products, apart from Clementine.
A Computational Logic for Applicative Common Lisp consists of a programming language, an extensible theory in a first-order logic, and a mechanical theorem prover [3] Arc: 2008: Paul Graham: Dialect of Lisp developed by Paul Graham and Robert Morris [4] AutoLISP: 1986: David Betz: Built to include and use with the full version of AutoCAD and ...
Operationally, Prolog's execution strategy can be thought of as a generalization of function calls in other languages, one difference being that multiple clause heads can match a given call. In that case, the system creates a choice-point, unifies the goal with the clause head of the first alternative, and continues with the goals of that first ...
Although the project initially explored the use of Prolog, it later adopted the use of concurrent logic programming, because it was closer to the FGCS computer architecture. However, the committed choice feature of concurrent logic programming interfered with the language's logical semantics [ 18 ] and with its suitability for knowledge ...
Assembly languages directly correspond to a machine language (see below), so machine code instructions appear in a form understandable by humans, although there may not be a one-to-one mapping between an individual statement and an individual instruction.