Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Lodi dynasty was an Afghan royal family that ruled Sultanate of Delhi from 1451 to 1526. [6] It was the fifth and final dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, and was founded by Bahlol Lodi when he replaced the Sayyid dynasty .
Ibrahim Khan Lodi (Persian: ابراهیم لودی; 1480 – 21 April 1526) was the last Sultan of the Delhi Sultanate, [2] [3] who became Sultan in 1517 after the death of his father Sikandar Khan.
Bahlul Khan Lodi (Persian: بهلول لودی; died 12 July 1489) was the chief of the Afghan Lodi tribe. [1] Founder of the Lodi dynasty from the Delhi Sultanate [2] upon the abdication of the last claimant from the previous Sayyid rule. [3]
The Lodi dynasty was an Afghan, or Turco-Afghan dynasty, [a] related to the Pashtun Lodi tribe. [155] [156] The founder of the dynasty, Bahlul Khan Lodi, was a Khalji of the Lodi clan. [157] He started his reign by attacking the Muslim Jaunpur Sultanate to expand the influence of the Delhi Sultanate and was partially successful through a treaty.
[1] [2] Following the conquest of India by the Ghurids, five unrelated heterogeneous dynasties ruled over the Delhi Sultanate sequentially: the Mamluk dynasty (1206–1290), the Khalji dynasty (1290–1320), the Tughlaq dynasty (1320–1414), [3] the Sayyid dynasty (1414–1451), and the Lodi dynasty (1451–1526).
The second and most successful ruler of the Lodi dynasty of the Delhi sultanate, he was also a poet of the Persian language and prepared a diwan of 9000 verses. [2] He made an effort to recover the lost territories which once were a part of the Delhi Sultanate and was able to expand the territory controlled by the Lodi Dynasty .
Bahlul Lodi's tomb is a building situated in Delhi, India, which is allegedly the tomb of an emperor of Delhi Sultanate and the founder of the Lodi Dynasty, Bahlul Khan Lodi (r. 1451 – 1489 A.D). The tomb is located in a historic settlement, Chirag Delhi, located within the fort walls of the Jahapanah city (built by the Tughlaqs). This tomb ...
[3] [4] [5] According to Samuel Miklos Stern, the Lodi dynasty itself might have been fabricated as its mention only starts appearing with later historians like Firishta. [6] Hudud al-'Alam mentions that the ruler was a Quraishite. [6] Ibn Hawqal who visited Multan in 367 AH also mentions that the rulers were the descendant of Sama bin Loi bin ...