Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
For example, a woman had just as much right as a man to demand the debt. The conjugal debt "took precedence over most other duties." Even in the case where a lord had called a man to rally. If his wife had insisted on the debt, "the wife's rights took precedence over the lord's." [9] A similar situation applied for crusading. If a man wanted to ...
Additional benefits to spouses of coal miners who die of black lung disease; $100,000 to spouse of any public safety officer killed in the line of duty; Continuation of employer-sponsored health benefits; Renewal and termination rights to spouse's copyrights on death of spouse; Continued water rights of spouse in some circumstances
In most jurisdictions including in federal courts, both the witness-spouse and the accused-spouse have the spousal communications privilege, so either may invoke it to prevent the witness-spouse from testifying about a confidential communication made during the marriage even if neither spouse is a party in the trial. [4]
If you and your spouse argue about money, you're not alone. Roughly 47% of couples have money-related conflicts at least some of the time. Finances are also one of the leading causes of divorce ...
Smith, for example, took out a loan to pay down her card balances. This is a popular method since personal loans often have lower interest rates than credit cards and come with fixed monthly payments.
ShutterstockExperts say there are several major money missteps widowers and widows tend to make after a partner's death. By Geoff Williams In the wake of a spouse's death, it may seem too soon to ...
Alimony, also called aliment (Scotland), maintenance (England, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Wales, Canada, New Zealand), spousal support (U.S., Canada) and spouse maintenance (Australia), [1] is a legal obligation on a person to provide financial support to their spouse before or after marital separation or divorce.
Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980), is a United States Supreme Court case involving the spousal privilege and its application in the law of evidence. In it, the Court held that the witness-spouse alone has a privilege to refuse to testify adversely; the witness may be neither compelled to testify nor foreclosed from testifying.