When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Critical appraisal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_appraisal

    Critical appraisal (or quality assessment) in evidence based medicine, is the use of explicit, transparent methods to assess the data in published research, applying the rules of evidence to factors such as internal validity, adherence to reporting standards, conclusions, generalizability and risk-of-bias.

  3. The Joanna Briggs Institute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Joanna_Briggs_Institute

    The JBI Model of Evidence-based Healthcare was developed in 2005 and updated in 2016. [4]It is described by reference to a pictogram, with one circle inside another. [5] The 'inner circle' represents the pebble of knowledge while the 'inner wedges' provide the organisation's conceptualization of the steps involved in the process of achieving an evidence-based approach to clinical decision-making.

  4. Behaviorally anchored rating scales - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behaviorally_anchored...

    Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) are scales used to rate performance.BARS are normally presented vertically with scale points ranging from five to nine. It is an appraisal method that aims to combine the benefits of narratives, critical incidents, and quantified ratings by anchoring a quantified scale with specific narrative examples of good, moderate, and poor performance.

  5. Jadad scale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jadad_scale

    The Jadad scale independently assesses the methodological quality of a clinical trial judging the effectiveness of blinding. Alejandro "Alex" Jadad Bechara, a Colombian physician who worked as a Research Fellow at the Oxford Pain Relief Unit, Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, at the University of Oxford described the allocating trials a score of between zero (very poor) and five (rigorous ...

  6. NUSAP - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NUSAP

    NUSAP is a notational system for the management and communication of uncertainty in science for policy, based on five categories for characterizing any quantitative statement: Numeral, Unit, Spread, Assessment and Pedigree.

  7. Cass Review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Review

    Cass Review Table 6: Critical appraisal domain scores A systematic review assessed 23 regional, national and international guidelines covering key areas of practice, such as care principles, assessment methods and medical interventions.

  8. Program evaluation and review technique - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_Evaluation_and...

    Activities that are on the critical path have a slack of zero (0). The duration of path adf is 14.83 work days. The duration of path aceg is 19.51 work days. The duration of path beg is 15.67 work days. The critical path is aceg and the critical time is 19.51 work days. It is important to note that there can be more than one critical path (in a ...

  9. DISCERN - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DISCERN

    DISCERN is an instrument designed to provide users with a reliable way to measure the quality of written health information.It was originally developed by Deborah Charnock, Sasha Shepperd, Gill Needham, and Robert Gann, who reported on its development and validation in a February 1999 paper.