When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Carl Cohen (philosopher) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Cohen_(philosopher)

    Arguments for animal experimentation, arguments against affirmative action. Carl Cohen (April 30, 1931 – August 26, 2023) was an American philosopher. He was Professor of Philosophy at the Residential College of the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S. Cohen was co-author of The Animal Rights Debate (Rowman and Littlefield ...

  3. Argument from marginal cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_marginal_cases

    The argument from marginal cases (also known as the argument from species overlap) [1] is a philosophical argument within animal rights theory regarding the moral status of non-human animals. Its proponents hold that if human infants, senile people, the comatose, and cognitively disabled people have direct moral status, non-human animals must ...

  4. Doctors Against Animal Experiments - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctors_Against_Animal...

    t. e. Doctors Against Animal Experiments (DAAE; Ärzte gegen Tierversuche) is an animal rights organization based in Cologne, which campaigns for the complete abolition of animal testing under the motto "Medical progress is important - animal testing is the wrong way". [ 1]

  5. Tom Regan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Regan

    Concept of "subject-of-a-life". Website. regan.animalsvoice.com. Tom Regan (/ ˈreɪɡən /; [1] November 28, 1938 – February 17, 2017) was an American philosopher who specialized in animal rights theory. He was professor emeritus of philosophy at North Carolina State University, where he had taught from 1967 until his retirement in 2001.

  6. The Case for Animal Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Case_for_Animal_Rights

    The Case for Animal Rights is a 1983 book by the American philosopher Tom Regan, in which the author argues that at least some kinds of non-human animals have moral rights because they are the "subjects-of-a-life", and that these rights adhere to them whether or not they are recognized. [1] The work is considered an important text within animal ...

  7. Michael Allen Fox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Allen_Fox

    This paper analysed and supplemented Joan Dunayer's critique of animal testing. After retracting his arguments in The Case for Animal Experimentation, Fox went on to author Deep Vegetarianism with Temple University Press in 1999. In this book, Fox presents arguments in favour of vegetarianism, exploring its cultural and historical background ...

  8. National Anti-Vivisection Society - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Anti-Vivisection...

    The National Anti-Vivisection Society (NAVS) is an international not-for-profit animal protection group, based in London, working to end animal testing, and focused on the replacement of animals in research with advanced, scientific techniques. Since 2006, the NAVS has operated its international campaigns under the working name Animal Defenders ...

  9. Objections to evolution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objections_to_evolution

    Objections to evolution have been raised since evolutionary ideas came to prominence in the 19th century. When Charles Darwin published his 1859 book On the Origin of Species, his theory of evolution (the idea that species arose through descent with modification from a single common ancestor in a process driven by natural selection) initially met opposition from scientists with different ...