When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Nixon v. Fitzgerald - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_v._Fitzgerald

    Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982), was a United States Supreme Court decision written by Justice Lewis Powell dealing with presidential immunity from civil liability for actions taken while in office. The Court found that a president "is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts."

  3. Absolute immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_immunity

    In 1982, the Supreme Court held in Nixon v. Fitzgerald that the president enjoys absolute immunity from civil litigation for official acts undertaken while in office. [11] The Court suggested that this immunity was broad (though not limitless), applying to acts within the "outer perimeter" of the president's official duties. [11]

  4. Presidential immunity in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_immunity_in...

    A sitting president of the United States has both civil and criminal immunity for their official acts. [a] Neither civil nor criminal immunity is explicitly granted in the Constitution or any federal statute. [1][2] The Supreme Court of the United States found in Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) that the president has absolute immunity from civil ...

  5. The Nixon rulings at the centre of Trump’s Supreme Court ...

    www.aol.com/nixon-rulings-centre-trump-supreme...

    Nixon v Fitzgerald. Mr Trump’s team heavily relies on the Nixon v Fitzgerald case, where the Supreme Court ruled that presidents cannot be sued for actions they conducted while in office.

  6. How racism, terrorism and police brutality paved the way for ...

    www.aol.com/racism-terrorism-police-brutality...

    Nixon v. Fitzgerald and the concept that a law must be “clearly established” are part of the legal rationale used to bestow immunity on future fuhrer Donald Trump. That’s right, the supposed ...

  7. Ty Cobb on Sotomayor dissent: ‘A lot of screaming and no ...

    www.aol.com/ty-cobb-sotomayor-dissent-lot...

    Fitzgerald dealt with presidential immunity from civil liability for actions taken while in office, while U.S. v. Nixon addressed whether a president has executive privilege in immunity from ...

  8. Harlow v. Fitzgerald - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlow_v._Fitzgerald

    Harlow v. Fitzgerald. Harlow v. Fitzgerald. Presidential aides were not entitled to absolute immunity, but instead deserved qualified immunity. Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court involving the doctrines of qualified immunity and absolute immunity.

  9. Opinion: Why Trump shouldn’t celebrate the immunity ruling ...

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-why-trump-shouldn-t...

    In doing so, the court adopted and modified the approach it had previously outlined, in the 1982 case Nixon v. Fitzgerald, establishing a president’s civil liability.