When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Misquoting Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misquoting_Jesus

    Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (published as Whose Word Is It? in the United Kingdom) is a book by Bart D. Ehrman, a New Testament scholar at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. [1] Published in 2005 by HarperCollins, the book introduces lay readers to the field of textual criticism of the Bible.

  3. Bart D. Ehrman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_D._Ehrman

    His thirty books include three college textbooks and six New York Times bestsellers: Misquoting Jesus, [9] Jesus, Interrupted, [10] God's Problem, [11] Forged, [12] [13] How Jesus Became God, [14] and The Triumph of Christianity. [15] More than two million copies of his books have been sold, and his books have been translated into 27 languages ...

  4. Trijicon biblical verses controversy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trijicon_biblical_verses...

    Another Trijicon scope marked with 1 John 1:7: "But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin." The Trijicon biblical verses controversy refers to the stamping of Bible verse references (e.g. " Rev 21 :23") onto optical sights for rifles ...

  5. Christ myth theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ_myth_theory

    The Christ myth theory, also known as the Jesus myth theory, Jesus mythicism, or the Jesus ahistoricity theory, [1] [q 1] is the fringe view that the story of Jesus is a work of mythology with no historical substance. [q 2] Alternatively, in terms given by Bart Ehrman paraphrasing Earl Doherty, it is the view that "the historical Jesus did not ...

  6. Jesus and the woman taken in adultery - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_and_the_woman_taken...

    Bart D. Ehrman concurs in Misquoting Jesus, adding that the passage contains many words and phrases otherwise alien to John's writing. [7] The evangelical Bible scholar Daniel B. Wallace agrees with Ehrman. [48] There are several excerpts from other authors that are consistent with this: Fragment 1 (Eusebius - 4th century):

  7. Jesus, Interrupted - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus,_Interrupted

    Another criticism raised, which was also raised over Misquoting Jesus, is that Ehrman implies that the information being presented is new, or groundbreaking. United Methodist bishop William H. Willimon says that "He keeps presenting this stuff as if this is wonderful new knowledge that has been kept from you backward lay people and this is the ...

  8. Forged (book) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forged_(book)

    Two of Jesus' disciples had that name, as did the brother of Jesus. It may very well have been written by someone named James. However, to the extent that the author gives the impression that they are James, the brother of Jesus, it might be considered a forgery: Ehrman notes that the author doesn't specify which James he is, meaning "that he ...

  9. Pseudepigrapha - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudepigrapha

    Scholars have identified seven levels of authenticity which they have organized in a hierarchy ranging from literal authorship, meaning written in the author's own hand, to outright forgery: [11] Literal authorship. A church leader writes a letter in his own hand. Dictation. A church leader dictates a letter almost word for word to an amanuensis.