When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2012) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency , 566 U.S. 120 (2012), also known as Sackett I (to distinguish it from the 2023 case ), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that orders issued by the Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Water Act are subject to the Administrative Procedure Act . [ 1 ]

  3. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 598 U.S. 651 (2023), also known as Sackett II (to distinguish it from the 2012 case), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that only wetlands and permanent bodies of water with a "continuous surface connection" to "traditional interstate navigable waters" are covered by the Clean Water Act.

  4. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency may refer to either of two United States Supreme Court cases: Environmental Protection Agency (2012) (alternatively called Sackett I ), 570 U.S. 205 (2013), a case in which the Court ruled that orders issued by the EPA under the Clean Water Act are subject to the Administrative Procedure Act .

  5. Letters: Supreme Court case, GOP walkout, gateway ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/letters-supreme-court-case-gop...

    A new Supreme Court case Sackett vs EPA is leaning toward a disregard for the environment as a whole, by dangerously putting property rights over already established environmental laws. The case ...

  6. NC cut its wetlands rules. Now millions of acres may be ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/nc-cut-wetlands-rules-now-083000916.html

    Just weeks before the Republican-controlled General Assembly passed the Farm Act over Gov. Roy Cooper’s veto, the U.S. Supreme Court in Sackett v. EPA narrowed the definition of wetlands covered ...

  7. New California water measures aim to increase fines for ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/california-water-measures-aim...

    The court’s ruling in Sackett vs. EPA rewrote the federal definition of wetlands and removed federal protections for many streams that do not flow year-round, leaving ephemeral streams ...

  8. Regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_of_greenhouse...

    EPA issued guidance to states on implementing the new GHG guidelines. EPA Fact Sheet: January 2011 New GHG air permitting began for facilities that would have to go through air permitting for non-GHG pollutants anyway. EPA GHG Permitting Fact Sheet: January 2011 EPA proposed a three-year deferral of GHG permitting for facilities that use biomass.

  9. Here are the major cases before the Supreme Court this fall - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/major-cases-supreme-court-fall...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us