When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Texas v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Johnson

    Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech.

  3. Bethel School District v. Fraser - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethel_School_District_v...

    The case involved free speech in public schools. On April 26, 1983, student Matthew Fraser was suspended from Bethel High School in Pierce County, Washington after he gave a speech including sexual innuendo while nominating a classmate for a student council position at a school assembly. Believing his speech to be inappropriate and vulgar, the ...

  4. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan

    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restrict the ability of a public official to sue for defamation.

  5. Gitlow v. New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitlow_v._New_York

    Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution had extended the First Amendment's provisions protecting freedom of speech and freedom of the press to apply to the governments of U.S. states.

  6. Forensic linguistics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_linguistics

    During the examination process, language plays a substantial role in the presentation of a story to the courtroom. A defendant's ambiguity may be deemed unacceptable. The language used by the lawyer to construct the story to the courtroom elicits specific responses from the witness, and specific emotions from the jury.

  7. Snyder v. Phelps - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snyder_v._Phelps

    Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that speech made in a public place on a matter of public concern cannot be the basis of liability for a tort of emotional distress, even if the speech is viewed as offensive or outrageous.

  8. Expert will testify Bryan Kohberger’s cell phone was outside ...

    www.aol.com/cellphone-tower-expert-testify-bryan...

    Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of killing four University of Idaho students in November 2022, was out driving west of Moscow, Idaho, the night of the slayings, his attorney says, and the defense ...

  9. Forensic rhetoric - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_rhetoric

    It was at this point in Athens history where the forensic speech-writer made his first appearance. The speech-writer would prepare an address which the litigant/defendant memorized and delivered before the court. Forensic speech-writing and oratory soon became an essential part of general rhetoric. [11]