When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucia_v._Securities_and...

    Like many other government agencies, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) uses administrative law judges (ALJ) to act as a judge in resolving disputes for the agency related to administrative law, those laws that describe how the agency is run. Prior to this case, through November 2017, the SEC had selected ALJ through an in-house ...

  3. Stanley v. City of Sanford - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_v._City_of_Sanford

    Stanley v. City of Sanford is a pending United States Supreme Court case in which the Court will determine whether or not a former employee who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed lose her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job, under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

  4. Administrative law judge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_law_judge

    Administrative law judges may be employed by a "central panel" organization, which provides the judges with independence from agencies. [6] The California Administrative Procedure Act created an early central panel in 1945, and it served as a model for other states. [6] By 2015, over half of states had created such panels. [7]

  5. Disability lawsuits surge in Florida. Are they removing ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/disability-lawsuits-surge-florida...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Richardson v. Perales - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richardson_v._Perales

    Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court to determine and delineate several questions concerning administrative procedure in Social Security disability cases.

  7. Mathews v. Eldridge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathews_v._Eldridge

    Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that individuals have a statutorily granted property right in Social Security benefits, and the termination of such benefits implicates due process but does not require a pre-termination hearing.

  8. Fear beat compassion in Stuart City Commission's ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/fear-beat-compassion-stuart-city...

    Usually, land-use cases are heard by state administrative law judges, then, on appeal, go before a panel of Florida Cabinet members, who have a track record of upholding local government decisions ...

  9. Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_Perez_v._Sturgis...

    Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, 598 U.S. 142 (2023), [1] was a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuit seeking compensatory damages for denial of a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) can proceed without exhausting the administrative procedures of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA ...