Ads
related to: is cnet a credible source for writing papers today
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an uninterrupted request for comment on the source's reliability that took place on the reliable sources noticeboard. For a discussion to be considered significant, most editors expect no fewer than ...
CNET TV was composed of CNET Central, The Web, and The New Edge. [13] [14] CNET Central was created first and aired in syndication in the United States on the USA Network. Later, it began airing on USA's sister network Sci-Fi Channel along with The Web and The New Edge. [13] These were later followed by TV.com in 1996.
WP:BLP - rules about living people, and what not to quote from sources. Other essays: WP:Reliable source examples - general issues to consider. Specific questions: WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - ask about specific sources. However, editors new to a particular topic might not realize some specific major publications are preferred as sources.
Reliable sources allow editors to verify that claims in an article are accurate. The higher the quality of the source for the statement it backs up, the more likely that statement is to be accurate. Independent sources help editors to write neutrally and to prove that the subject has received note. Wherever possible, editors should aim to use ...
Fake news websites are those which intentionally, but not necessarily solely, publish hoaxes and disinformation for purposes other than news satire. Some of these sites use homograph spoofing attacks , typosquatting and other deceptive strategies similar to those used in phishing attacks to resemble genuine news outlets.
InfoWars and Breitbart were near the bottom of the list along with The Onion, a satirical website.
News articles and reviews written by staff (paid CBS Interactive / CNET) can be considered reliable, though most do not cover anime/manga. (RSN discussion: 1, 2) Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org) - All language versions of Wikipedia and sites that mirror it, are not considered reliable sources for the content taken from the articles themselves ...
According to our content guideline on identifying reliable sources, a reliable source has the following characteristics: It has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. It is published. It is appropriate for the material in question, i.e., the source is directly about the subject, rather than mentioning something unrelated in passing.