Ads
related to: current court cases in the media bias
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
National Association of African-American-Owned Media, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), is a United States Supreme Court case related to protections against racial discrimination in the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The case relates to whether cable television operator Comcast engaged in racial discrimination in refusing to carry channels from Entertainment ...
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC and NetChoice, LLC v.Paxton, 603 U.S. 707 (2024), were United States Supreme Court cases related to protected speech under the First Amendment and content moderation by interactive service providers on the Internet under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
By Jack Queen (Reuters) - U.S. President-elect Donald Trump is making good on his threats to go after the media in court, with several recent lawsuits seeking damages against major publishers over ...
Supreme Court of Canada: 1994 Orr v. Orr: alimony: Supreme Court of the United States: 1979 Pao v. Kleiner Perkins: employment discrimination based on sex: San Francisco County Superior Court: 2015 Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney: hiring preference to veterans over non-veterans: Supreme Court of the United States: 1979 R v ...
The Supreme Court wrestled Tuesday with whether public officials can block critics from commenting on their social media accounts, an issue that first arose in a case involving former President ...
The White House argues that social media companies should limit misinformation, but two state AGs say the federal government should not be involved. Supreme Court hearing social media ...
Here is a look at some of the cases the justices are due to decide. Another major gun rights dispute is coming to the justices as they are poised to decide whether a 1994 federal law that bars ...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in the initial case ([6]) that the FCC cannot punish broadcast stations for such incidents. [7] The FCC appealed to the Supreme Court, [8] and in the 2009 case, the Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit, [9] finding that the new policy was not arbitrary. However, the issue of ...