Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Download as PDF; Printable version ... (8th c. CE), also called Adi Shankaracharya ... the Brhat-Sankara-Vijaya by Citsukha is the oldest hagiography but only ...
Adi Shankara, a Hindu philosopher of the Advaita Vedanta school, composed a number of commentarial works. Due to his later influence, a large body of works that is central to the Advaita Vedanta interpretation of the Prasthanatrayi, the canonical texts consisting of the Upanishads, the Bhagavad Gita and the Brahma Sutras, is also attributed to him.
The metrical part "discusses and repeatedly explains many basic problems of Advaita or "non-dualism" from different points of view" in a non-systematical way. [7] Positing that the "I," Atman, is self-evident, Shankara argues that Atman, Awareness, Consciousness, is the True Self, and not the mind and the body.
The Dasha Shloki (Sanskrit: दशश्लोकी, romanized: Daśaślokī) is a Sanskrit hymn by the Hindu philosopher Adi Shankara. Comprising ten verses, [ 1 ] the Dasha Shloki explores the Brahman-Atman relationship and the author's interpretation of the nature of the self.
The authorship of Ātma-bodha, written in Sanskrit language, is traditionally ascribed to Adi Shankara who is believed to have lived in the 8th century A.D. According to Isaeva, even though the authenticity of this work is doubted by present day scholars, it does not contradict the whole of Shankara's system which it advocates. [2]
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; ... Liṃgāṣṭakaṃ) is a Hindu hymn attributed to the 8th-century philosopher Adi Shankara.
The text is as follows: [3] I am not mind, nor intellect, nor ego, nor the reflections of inner self (citta). I am not the five senses, nor am I the five elements.
The Madhaviya Shankara (Dig)vijayam, also known as Samkshepa-Shankara-Vijaya, a hagiography about the life and achievements of Shankara Bhagavat-Pada (Adi Shankara), is usually attributed to Madhava-Vidyaranya, and dated to the 14th century. The attribution and dating is disputed; the author was a Madhava, and the correct seems to be the 17th ...