When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shelby County v. Holder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_County_v._Holder

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4 ...

  3. A look at Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s notable opinions, votes

    www.aol.com/news/2020-10-11-a-look-at-judge-amy...

    Barrett wrote a unanimous three-judge panel decision in 2019 making it easier for men alleged to have committed sexual assaults on campus to challenge the proceedings against them.

  4. Supreme Court makes it easier to sue for job discrimination ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-makes-easier-sue...

    Lawyer for St. Louis police sergeant hailed unanimous Supreme Court decision as a big win for workers WASHINGTON (AP) — […] The post Supreme Court makes it easier to sue for job discrimination ...

  5. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brnovich_v._Democratic...

    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case related to voting rights established by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), and specifically the applicability of Section 2's general provision barring discrimination against minorities in state and local election laws in the wake of the 2013 Supreme Court decision Shelby County v.

  6. Wisconsin v. Mitchell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_v._Mitchell

    Mitchell appealed the decision of the Wisconsin Circuit Court, alleging that the Wisconsin statute unconstitutionally infringed upon his First Amendment rights. The appeal was rejected by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals , but the Wisconsin Supreme Court reversed this, arguing that the statute was a direct violation of the First Amendment ...

  7. Supreme Court makes it easier to sue for job discrimination ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-makes-easier-sue...

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday made it easier for workers who are transferred from one job to another against their will to pursue job discrimination claims under federal civil rights law, even ...

  8. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swierkiewicz_v._Sorema_N._A.

    Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 26, 2002. The Court held that for complaints in employment discrimination cases, a plaintiff is not required to allege specific facts that establish a prima facie case as required by the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework.

  9. Bostock v. Clayton County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County

    Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.