When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Supreme Court makes it easier to sue for job discrimination ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-makes-easier-sue...

    Lawyer for St. Louis police sergeant hailed unanimous Supreme Court decision as a big win for workers WASHINGTON (AP) — […] The post Supreme Court makes it easier to sue for job discrimination ...

  3. Supreme Court makes it easier to sue for job discrimination ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-makes-easier-sue...

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday made it easier for workers who are transferred from one job to another against their will to pursue job discrimination claims under federal civil rights law, even ...

  4. The biggest Supreme Court decisions of 2024: From ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/biggest-supreme-court-decisions-2024...

    The ruling reversed a lower court decision, which the justices said swept too broadly into areas like peaceful but disruptive conduct, and returned the case to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

  5. Bostock v. Clayton County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County

    Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.

  6. R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R.G._&_G.R._Harris_Funeral...

    A background article written by CNN's legal analyst & Supreme Court biographer Joan Biskupic who details the decision-making process leading to the landmark court decision in R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Archived from the original on November 13, 2020. Retrieved on November 24, 2020.

  7. Wisconsin v. Mitchell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_v._Mitchell

    Mitchell appealed the decision of the Wisconsin Circuit Court, alleging that the Wisconsin statute unconstitutionally infringed upon his First Amendment rights. The appeal was rejected by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals , but the Wisconsin Supreme Court reversed this, arguing that the statute was a direct violation of the First Amendment ...

  8. Supreme Court won't review admissions policy challenged as ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-wont-review...

    WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court on Monday declined to decide whether Asian Americans and white students can challenge a school's admissions policy as discriminatory even if those racial groups ...

  9. Shaw v. Reno - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaw_v._Reno

    Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering. [1] After the 1990 census, North Carolina qualified to have a 12th district and drew it in a distinct snake-like manner to create a "majority-minority" Black district.