Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Punitive damages (sums intended to punish the defendant) may be awarded in addition to actual damages intended to compensate the plaintiff. Punitive damage awards generally require a higher showing than mere negligence, but lower than intention. For instance, grossly negligent, reckless, or outrageous conduct may be grounds for an award of ...
In Australia, punitive damages are not available for breach of contract, [5] but are possible for tort cases.. The law is less settled regarding equitable wrongs. In Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd, [6] the defendant employees knowingly breached contractual and fiduciary duties to their employer by diverting business to themselves and misusing its confidential information.
The claimant could be awarded nominal damage, if no harm came to them because this tort is actionable per se. [22] Additionally, they could be entitled to: compensatory damages whereby you try and put the claimant in the position they would have been in before the assault occurred, [22] or the claimant could be entitled to an injunction whereby ...
Comparative negligence – A partial defense that reduces the amount of damages a plaintiff can claim based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the damages. Most jurisdictions have adopted this doctrine; those not adopting it are Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, And Washington D.C.
Hsu’s lawsuit, which asks for unspecified punitive damages, says the September 2020 assault “required… multiple surgeries to his skull and brain,” and that he will require ongoing medical ...
The punishment of punitive damages should fall squarely upon the individuals who are supposed to be punished. Yet in New York City it doesn’t. Punitive Damages Against Police Officers Do Not ...
In the United States, though rarely awarded in tort cases, punitive damages are available and are sometimes quite staggering when awarded. [ae] Limits on damages for pain and suffering are another category of tort reform. While tort compensation easily applies to property damage, where the replacement value is a market price (plus interest ...
An intentional tort is a category of torts that describes a civil wrong resulting from an intentional act on the part of the tortfeasor (alleged wrongdoer). The term negligence, on the other hand, pertains to a tort that simply results from the failure of the tortfeasor to take sufficient care in fulfilling a duty owed, while strict liability torts refers to situations where a party is liable ...