Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In number theory, Fermat's Last Theorem (sometimes called Fermat's conjecture, especially in older texts) states that no three positive integers a, b, and c satisfy the equation a n + b n = c n for any integer value of n greater than 2. The cases n = 1 and n = 2 have been known since antiquity to have infinitely many solutions. [1]
The first of these (1 m + 2 3 = 3 2) is the only solution where one of a, b or c is 1, according to the Catalan conjecture, proven in 2002 by Preda Mihăilescu. While this case leads to infinitely many solutions of (1) (since one can pick any m for m > 6), these solutions only give a single triplet of values (a m, b n, c k).
Conjecture Field Comments Eponym(s) Cites 1/3–2/3 conjecture: order theory: n/a: 70 abc conjecture: number theory: ⇔Granville–Langevin conjecture, Vojta's conjecture in dimension 1 ⇒Erdős–Woods conjecture, Fermat–Catalan conjecture Formulated by David Masser and Joseph Oesterlé. [1] Proof claimed in 2012 by Shinichi Mochizuki: n/a ...
In mathematics, a conjecture is a conclusion or a proposition that is proffered on a tentative basis without proof. [1] [2] [3] Some conjectures, such as the Riemann hypothesis or Fermat's conjecture (now a theorem, proven in 1995 by Andrew Wiles), have shaped much of mathematical history as new areas of mathematics are developed in order to ...
Fermat's Last Theorem states that no three positive integers (a, b, c) can satisfy the equation a n + b n = c n for any integer value of n greater than 2. (For n equal to 1, the equation is a linear equation and has a solution for every possible a and b.
The conjecture represents an attempt to generalize Fermat's Last Theorem, which is the special case n = 2: if + =, then 2 ≥ k. Although the conjecture holds for the case k = 3 (which follows from Fermat's Last Theorem for the third powers), it was disproved for k = 4 and k = 5.
To prove the Fermat's Last Theorem for a strong irregular prime p is more difficult (since Kummer proved the first case of Fermat's Last Theorem for B-regular primes, Vandiver proved the first case of Fermat's Last Theorem for E-regular primes), the most difficult is that p is not only a strong irregular prime, but 2p + 1, 4p + 1, 8p + 1, 10p ...
3 6 + 19 6 + 22 6 = 10 6 + 15 6 + 23 6 (found by K. Subba Rao in 1934). The conjecture implies in the special case of m = 1 that if = = (under the conditions given above) then n ≥ k − 1. An interpretation of Plato's number is a solution for k = 3