Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In these we may think and let think; we may 'agree to disagree.' But, meantime, let us hold fast the essentials... [1] In a subsequent letter to his brother Charles, Wesley attributed it to Whitefield (presumably George Whitefield): "If you agree with me, well: if not, we can, as Mr. Whitefield used to say, agree to disagree."
Science & Tech. Shopping. Sports
When we encounter someone we disagree with, it’s easy to make assumptions about why they hold their opposing views. It’s much more difficult, and powerful, to lean in to our curiosity and try ...
The fallacy is sometimes presented as "let's agree to disagree". [3] Whether one has a particular entitlement or right is irrelevant to whether one's assertion is true or false. Where an objection to a belief is made, the assertion of the right to an opinion side-steps the usual steps of discourse of either asserting a justification of that ...
However, while in groupthink, individuals undergo self-deception and distortion of their own views (driven by, for example, not wanting to suffer in anticipation of a future they sense they cannot avoid by speaking out), whereas in the Abilene Paradox, individuals are unable to perceive the views or preferences of others, or to manage an agreement.
An example in practice has been cited in the case of Weise v. Rainville (1959) 173 CA2d 496, 506, where the objection to such a question was sustained because such a question "raises the danger that the witness does not intend to reply to both questions" when answering "yes" to the compound question. [ 10 ]
Science & Tech. Shopping. Sports
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us