Ads
related to: top wilderness movies list rotten tomatoes review of gladiator 2
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
"Gladiator II" doesn't try to out-epic the original movie. Instead, it veers more bonkers with a steely Paul Mescal and a delicious Denzel Washington. 'Gladiator 2' review: Yes, we are entertained ...
On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 71% of 372 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 6.6/10. The website's consensus reads: "Echoing its predecessor while upping the bloodsport and camp, Gladiator II is an action extravaganza that derives much of its strength and honor from Denzel Washington's scene-stealing ...
Related: Now entering the arena: Paul Mescal and Pedro Pascal unsheathe Gladiator II Scott's sequel is the epitome of an epic, its towering sets, opulent costumes, and bustling crowd scenes ...
“Gladiator II” isn’t quite the prestige film the first one, a best-picture winner, was in 2001. It’s more a swaggering, sword-and-sandal epic that prizes the need to entertain above all else.
To date, Lady Bird has a 99% rating with 398 positive reviews and four negative reviews. [8] Paddington 2 held a perfect rating from its release in 2017 until a film critic published a negative review in June 2021. To date, Paddington 2 has a 99% rating with 251 positive reviews and two negative reviews. [9]
In 2021, Empire magazine ranked Gladiator 39th on its "100 Best Movies Of All Time" list, and declared it the 22nd best film of the 21st century. [66] [67] The review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes included the film on its list of "140 Essential 2000s Movies". [68] The character Maximus placed 95th on Empire's list of 100 Greatest Movie Characters ...
Helmed by "Gladiator" director Ridley Scott, the movie stars Denzel Washington, Connie Nielsen, Paul Mescal and Pedro Pascal and is a follow up to the first "Gladiator" film that came out in 2000.
The list shows the 100% rating of 2022 documentary "Attica" as being based on 56 reviews. But the wiki article about "Attica" states that "On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 98% of 48 critics' reviews are positive". Therefore FIRSTLY either the listing or the article sentence is wrong.