Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Jury nullification, also known in the United Kingdom as jury equity, [1] [2] or a perverse verdict, [3] [4] is when the jury in a criminal trial gives a verdict of not guilty even though they think a defendant has broken the law.
Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a not guilty verdict in a criminal case where the jury believes that the defendant has, beyond a reasonable doubt, committed a crime. In other...
Essentially, with jury nullification, the jury returns a “not guilty” verdict even if jurors believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant broke the law. This can occur because a not guilty verdict cannot be overturned and jurors are protected regardless of their verdicts.
Jury nullification happens when the jury finds a “not guilty” verdict for a defendant because they disagree with the applicable law. A great example of jury nullification pertains to the Prohibition era.
In the United States, jury nullification occurs when a jury in a criminal case reaches a verdict contrary to the weight of evidence, sometimes because of a disagreement with the relevant law. [1] It has its origins in colonial America under British law.
When jurors in capital cases convict the accused and find in the sentencing phase of the trial that the necessary conditions have been met to impose the death penalty, but choose instead to sentence them to life without parole, this may also be referred to as jury nullification.
Jury nullification occurs when a trial jury reaches a verdict that is contrary to the letter of the law because the jurors either: disagree with the law under which the defendant is prosecuted, or believe that the law shouldn't be applied in the case at hand.
Jury nullification happens when juries disregard that oath and acquit a defendant because they disagree with the law. This article examines jury nullification, including its definition, legality, examples, and where to find more information. The Role of Juries in the American Legal System.
Jury nullification has a long history in American law. As far back as 1735, a journal printer was accused of seditious libel for criticizing the British, but a jury ignored the law and acquitted him. In the 19th century, Northern juries ignored federal fugitive slave laws and acquitted people who assisted escaping slaves.
Jury nullification is what happens when juries disregard that oath because they do not agree with the law. The concept of jury nullification is based on the theory that the average citizen, when serving on a jury, should be able to override or nullify the laws passed by the legislative body.