Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The probability of college athletes becoming employees has gripped much of college athletics in fear. Some lawmakers plan to address the concept in a congressional bill.
Jason Stahl, executive director of the College Football Players Association advocacy group, says lawmakers should create a special status for college athletes that would give them the right to ...
Top college athletes should be allowed to operate competitively in the open marketplace. In fact, many Division I athletes drive sports programs that generate outrageously large profits for their ...
Due to the increasing popularity of college sports because of television and media coverage, some players on college sports teams are receiving compensation from sources other than the NCAA. [32] For instance, CBS paid around $800 million for broadcasting rights to a three-week 2014 men's basketball tournament. [32]
Over the past five years, students have paid nearly $90 million in mandatory athletic fees to support football and other intercollegiate athletics — one of the highest contributions in the country. A river of cash is flowing into college sports, financing a spending spree among elite universities that has sent coaches’ salaries soaring and ...
The legal landscape seems increasingly receptive to the idea that college athletes should be compensated for the profits they produce for schools. March Madness brings in millions for colleges ...
The NCAA board voted to allow college athletes to get paid for the use of their names, images, and likenesses; the move would usher in a sea change in college athletics, but will also be ...
The Fair Pay to Play Act, originally known as California Senate Bill 206, [2] is a California statute that will allow collegiate athletes to acquire endorsements and sponsorships while still maintaining athletic eligibility. [3] The bill would affect college athletes in California's public universities and colleges.