Ad
related to: philosophy of law pdf philippines free
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
He was a law professor, a writer of law books, bar reviewer and lecturer and political commentator in the Philippines. Fernandez was an authority on constitutional law and labor law, being part of the Philippine jurisprudence project (UP Law Center) and wrote a number of papers on labor law, constitutional law and libel Law.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
Jurisprudence, also known as theory of law or philosophy of law, is the examination in a general perspective of what law is and what it ought to be.It investigates issues such as the definition of law; legal validity; legal norms and values; as well as the relationship between law and other fields of study, including economics, ethics, history, sociology, and political philosophy.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
He is a member of the faculty of the University of the Philippines College of Law since 2000, where he teaches Advanced Constitutional Litigation, Constitutional Law, and Philosophy of Law, with emphasis on issues relating to Church and State, post-colonial constitutionalism, and the relationship between the information environment and legal ...
The first, divine positive law, "concerns the duties of religion" and is derived from revelation. He contrasted it with divine natural law, which is "recognized by reason alone, without the aid of revelation". [9] The third, the positive law of independent states, is the law posited by "the supreme power in the state".
Law and economics; Law and Gospel; Law and literature; Law as integrity; Law in action; Law of Christ; Law, Legislation and Liberty; Laws (dialogue) Learned Hand; Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy; Legal formalism; Legal humanists; Legal moralism; Legal naturalism; Legal origins theory; Legal pluralism; Legal positivism; Legal ...
Legal formalism is both a descriptive and normative theory of how judges should decide cases. [1] In its descriptive sense, formalists maintain that judges reach their decisions by applying uncontroversial principles to the facts; formalists believe that there is an underlying logic to the many legal principles that may be applied in different cases.