Ads
related to: another word for unverified research on resume
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
As a result of confusion over the meaning of factoid, some English-language style and usage guides discourage its use. [9] William Safire in his "On Language" column advocated the use of the word factlet instead of factoid to express a brief interesting fact as well as a "little bit of arcana" but did not explain how adopting this new term would alleviate the ongoing confusion over the ...
Misinformation can also often be observed as news events are unfolding and questionable or unverified information fills information gaps. Even if later retracted, false information can continue to influence actions and memory. [26] Rumors are unverified information not attributed to any particular source and may be either true or false. [27]
The exception here is for unverified information about living persons. Other than that, unverified and/or poorly spelled or worded content can and should remain in Wikipedia so that if someone better equipped to verify it, spell-check it or reword it comes along, they can do so without having to dig in the article history.
Research has shown that fact-checking has limits, and can even backfire, [89] which is when a correction increases the their belief in the misconception. [90] One reason is that it can be interpreted as an argument from authority , leading to resistance and hardening beliefs, "because identity and cultural positions cannot be disproved."
Sometimes the entire article is supported by a list of sources in a section at the bottom of the article (this approach was common in the past). This makes it harder to verify specific statements and to rule out possibilities of original research, but the article cannot be presumed to be unreferenced in such circumstances. If a book is listed ...
For example, a paper reviewing existing research, a review article, monograph, or textbook is often better than a primary research paper. When relying on primary sources, extreme caution is advised. Wikipedians should never interpret the content of primary sources for themselves (see Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of ...