When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Uniform Environmental Covenants Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Environmental...

    The act is intended to provide clear rules for perpetual real estate interests – an environmental covenant – to regulate the use of brownfield land when real estate is transferred from one owner to another. The Uniform Law Commissioners completed the proposed act in 2003. Several states have adopted the Act.

  3. Covert listening device - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_listening_device

    Laws on listening devices varies between states within the US. Typically the variation comes on whether or not the state is a one or two party consent state. Within one party consent states, only one party must approve the recording, whereas in all party consent states all parties must consent to the recording.

  4. Wiretapping - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiretapping

    Wiretapping, also known as wire tapping or telephone tapping, is the monitoring of telephone and Internet-based conversations by a third party, often by covert means.The wire tap received its name because, historically, the monitoring connection was an actual electrical tap on an analog telephone or telegraph line.

  5. This Florida law is a first-of-its-kind that now other states are considering. ... owner of real estate and economic research firm Jack McCabe Expert Services in Deerfield Beach. “The biggest ...

  6. Chinese Hackers Used U.S. Government-Mandated Wiretap ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/chinese-hackers-used-u...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Olmstead v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olmstead_v._United_States

    Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, on the matter of whether wiretapping of private telephone conversations, conducted by federal agents without a search warrant with recordings subsequently used as evidence, constituted a violation of the target’s rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

  8. Phone calls with law enforcement can be recorded without ...

    www.aol.com/phone-calls-law-enforcement-recorded...

    A Florida appeals court has effectively opened a loophole in the state's long-standing law against recording telephone conversations without the permission of both sides of the call, ruling that ...

  9. Nardone v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nardone_v._United_States

    Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that evidence obtained via warrantless wiretaps, in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, was inadmissible in federal court. [1]