Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A collision attack exists that can find collisions within seconds on a computer with a 2.6 GHz Pentium 4 processor (complexity of 2 24.1). [19] Further, there is also a chosen-prefix collision attack that can produce a collision for two inputs with specified prefixes within seconds, using off-the-shelf computing hardware (complexity 2 39). [20]
An extension of the collision attack is the chosen-prefix collision attack, which is specific to Merkle–Damgård hash functions.In this case, the attacker can choose two arbitrarily different documents, and then append different calculated values that result in the whole documents having an equal hash value.
In cryptography, the Merkle–Damgård construction or Merkle–Damgård hash function is a method of building collision-resistant cryptographic hash functions from collision-resistant one-way compression functions. [1]: 145 This construction was used in the design of many popular hash algorithms such as MD5, SHA-1, and SHA-2.
For a word size w between 1-64 bits, the hash provides a security claim of 2 9.5w. The attack can find a collision in 2 11w time. [21] RIPEMD-160 2 80: 48 of 80 rounds (2 51 time) 2006 Paper. [22] SHA-0: 2 80: 2 33.6 time 2008-02-11 Two-block collisions using boomerang attack. Attack takes estimated 1 hour on an average PC. [23] Streebog: 2 256
All currently known practical or almost-practical attacks [3] [4] on MD5 and SHA-1 are collision attacks. [5] In general, a collision attack is easier to mount than a preimage attack, as it is not restricted by any set value (any two values can be used to collide). The time complexity of a brute-force collision attack, in contrast to the ...
The US National Security Agency developed the Secure Hash Algorithm series of MD5-like hash functions: SHA-0 was a flawed algorithm that the agency withdrew; SHA-1 is widely deployed and more secure than MD5, but cryptanalysts have identified attacks against it; the SHA-2 family improves on SHA-1, but is vulnerable to clashes as of 2011; and ...
Functions that lack this property are vulnerable to second pre-image attacks. Collision resistance: it should be hard to find two different messages m 1 and m 2 such that hash(m 1) = hash(m 2). Such a pair is called a (cryptographic) hash collision. This property is sometimes referred to as strong collision resistance.
As the PPP sends data unencrypted and "in the clear", CHAP is vulnerable to any attacker who can observe the PPP session. An attacker can see the user's name, CHAP challenge, CHAP response, and any other information associated with the PPP session. The attacker can then mount an offline dictionary attack in