Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A problem statement is a description of an issue to be addressed, or a condition to be improved upon. It identifies the gap between the current problem and goal. The first condition of solving a problem is understanding the problem, which can be done by way of a problem statement. [1]
The modern statement of the Hodge conjecture is: Let X be a non-singular complex projective variety. Then every Hodge class on X is a linear combination with rational coefficients of the cohomology classes of complex subvarieties of X. The official statement of the problem was given by Pierre Deligne. [12]
The problem is a paradox of the veridical type, because the solution is so counterintuitive it can seem absurd but is nevertheless demonstrably true. The Monty Hall problem is mathematically related closely to the earlier three prisoners problem and to the much older Bertrand's box paradox.
Best 'I Statements' To Use in the Workplace 1. "I feel frustrated that you missed the project deadline." You outlined all the deadlines in Asana or Trello, did your share and your colleague ...
The problem of dealing with all these potential exceptions is known as the qualification problem. 5. Inference from the absence of information. It is often reasonable to infer that a statement A is false from the fact that one does not know A to be true, or from the fact that it is not stated to be true in a problem statement. 6.
The Yang–Mills existence and mass gap problem is an unsolved problem in mathematical physics and mathematics, and one of the seven Millennium Prize Problems defined by the Clay Mathematics Institute, which has offered a prize of US$1,000,000 for its solution. The problem is phrased as follows: [1] Yang–Mills Existence and Mass Gap.
Statements of value (normative or prescriptive statements), which encompass ethics and aesthetics, and are studied via axiology. This barrier between fact and value, as construed in epistemology, implies it is impossible to derive ethical claims from factual arguments, or to defend the former using the latter.
The apparent gap between "is" statements and "ought" statements, when combined with Hume's fork, renders "ought" statements of dubious validity.Hume's fork is the idea that all items of knowledge are based either on logic and definitions, or else on observation.