When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shewhart individuals control chart - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shewhart_individuals...

    The value 2.66 is obtained by dividing 3 by the sample size-specific d 2 anti-biasing constant for n=2, as given in most textbooks on statistical process control (see, for example, Montgomery [2]: 725 ).

  3. Chebyshev's inequality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chebyshev's_inequality

    Chebyshev's inequality can also be obtained directly from a simple comparison of areas, starting from the representation of an expected value as the difference of two improper Riemann integrals (last formula in the definition of expected value for arbitrary real-valued random variables).

  4. Wald's equation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wald's_equation

    Then S N is identically equal to zero, hence E[S N] = 0, but E[X 1] = ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ and E[N] = ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ and therefore Wald's equation does not hold. Indeed, the assumptions , , and are satisfied, however, the equation in assumption holds for all n ∈ except for n = 1.

  5. Lorenz curve - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_curve

    Lorenz curve for US wealth distribution in 2016 showing negative wealth and oligarchy. The Lorenz curve is a probability plot (a P–P plot) comparing the distribution of a variable against a hypothetical uniform distribution of that variable.

  6. Grönwall's inequality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grönwall's_inequality

    In mathematics, Grönwall's inequality (also called Grönwall's lemma or the Grönwall–Bellman inequality) allows one to bound a function that is known to satisfy a certain differential or integral inequality by the solution of the corresponding differential or integral equation. There are two forms of the lemma, a differential form and an ...

  7. Fourier–Motzkin elimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier–Motzkin_elimination

    Since all the inequalities are in the same form (all less-than or all greater-than), we can examine the coefficient signs for each variable. Eliminating x would yield 2*2 = 4 inequalities on the remaining variables, and so would eliminating y. Eliminating z would yield only 3*1 = 3 inequalities so we use that instead.

  8. Predictor–corrector method - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictor–corrector_method

    The next, "corrector" step refines the initial approximation by using the predicted value of the function and another method to interpolate that unknown function's value at the same subsequent point. Predictor–corrector methods for solving ODEs

  9. Simpson's rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson's_rule

    Composite Simpson's 3/8 rule is even less accurate. Integration by Simpson's 1/3 rule can be represented as a weighted average with 2/3 of the value coming from integration by the trapezoidal rule with step h and 1/3 of the value coming from integration by the rectangle rule with step 2h. The accuracy is governed by the second (2h step) term