When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: rule 50 motion federal court decision

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Civil...

    Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the two are not separate motions, the JNOV motion is simply a renewed Rule 50(a) motion. A renewed 50(a) motion must be filed within 28 days of verdict entry. Rule 50 also covers motions for a new trial. These motions can be granted, denied, conditionally granted, or conditionally denied.

  3. Judgment as a matter of law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgment_as_a_matter_of_law

    Judgment on the pleadings is a motion made after pleading and before discovery; summary judgment happens after discovery and before trial; JMOL occurs during trial. [5] In United States federal courts, JMOL is a creation of Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

  4. Renewed judgment as a matter of law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewed_judgment_as_a...

    Renewed JMOL is decided after a jury has returned its verdict, and is a motion to have that verdict altered. In US federal courts this procedure has replaced judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) through Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [1] Renewed JMOL can only be raised before a jury begins deliberations.

  5. Motion (legal) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_(legal)

    This motion can be used in a criminal case only to reverse a guilty verdict; not guilty verdicts are immune to reversal by the court. Under Rule 50, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the motion for directed verdict and JNOV have been replaced by the motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL), which can be made at the close of the opposing ...

  6. Judgment notwithstanding verdict - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgment_notwithstanding...

    The rarely granted intervention permits the judge to exercise discretion to avoid extreme and unreasonable jury decisions. In civil cases in U.S. federal court, the term was replaced in 1991 by the renewed judgment as a matter of law, which emphasizes its relationship to the judgment as a matter of law, formerly called a directed verdict. [1]

  7. Mifepristone ruling – latest: Supreme Court decision keeps ...

    www.aol.com/mifepristone-ruling-live-supreme...

    The court would either continue pausing a federal judge’s decision to block the FDA’s approval of the drug or allow the ruling to stand while the case continues to play out in the appeals court.