When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan

    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution limit the ability of a public official to sue for defamation.

  3. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas thinks the press has ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-justice-clarence...

    Some speculate that Thomas wants to re-examine the ruling in New York Times v. Sullivan in light of recent ProPublica reports that have raised questions about ethics as a Supreme Court justice ...

  4. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gertz_v._Robert_Welch,_Inc.

    A new trial was ordered. Blackmun's short concurrence praised his brethren for clarifying an issue he had felt was left undecided in Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc., [6] one of the earlier defamation cases. He also scoffed at fears expressed by dissenters that the press was now too unconstrained: "What the Court has done, I believe, will have ...

  5. United States defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

    The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, however, radically changed the nature of libel law in the United States by establishing that public officials could win a suit for libel only when they could prove the media outlet in question knew either that the information was wholly and patently false or that it was published "with reckless ...

  6. Fox News and 2020 election lies set to face jury come Monday

    www.aol.com/news/fox-news-2020-election-lies...

    The trial will test press freedom and the reputation of ... which could use it as a pretext to weaken the actual malice standard that was set in a 1964 decision in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ...

  7. New york times v. sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=New_york_times_v...

    What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code

  8. Time, Inc. v. Firestone - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time,_Inc._v._Firestone

    Time alleged that Mary was a public figure and could not recover damages based on the ruling of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), which protected media from liability in such suits except in cases where there is knowledge of falsity or a reckless disregard for truth. [2]

  9. Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnett_v._National...

    Carol Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc. was a decision by the California Court of Appeal, which ruled that the "actual malice" required under California law for imposition of punitive damages is distinct from the "actual malice" required by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan to be liable for defaming a "public figure", and that the National Enquirer is not a "newspaper" for the purposes of ...