Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution limit the ability of a public official to sue for defamation.
Case name Citation Date decided Wesberry v. Sanders: 376 U.S. 1: 1964: Wright v. Rockefeller: 376 U.S. 52: 1964: United States v. Healy: 376 U.S. 75: 1964: United ...
Sanders (376 US 1 1964): The Supreme Court of the United States rules that congressional districts have to be approximately equal in population. February 23 – Chrysler's second generation Hemi racing engine is showcased at the Daytona 500. The 426 hemi-powered Plymouth of Richard Petty (#43) wins. Hemi-powered Plymouths finish in first ...
This white-on-white Lincoln was former president Lyndon B. Johnson's peresonal car, used to drive around his Texas ranch. LBJ's 1964 Lincoln Continental Convertible Is Our Bring a Trailer Auction ...
Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a case is transferred from a federal court in one state to a federal court in another, the choice of law should be that of the state in which the case was originally filed.
Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court decision that was a companion case to Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. that the Court decided on the same day. Like Sears, Compco held that state law that in effect duplicates the protections of the US patent law is pre-empted by federal law. [1]
The 60th anniversary of the peak year for Beatlemania in the United States, 1964, ... 1964 U.S. Albums In Mono,” a forthcoming boxed set that compiles seven albums that were released by the Fab ...
Wright v. Rockefeller, 376 U.S. 52 (1964), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in cases involving allegations of improper racial gerrymandering, where the evidence was "equally, or more, persuasive" that racial considerations had not motivated the state legislature, the court will give deference to the findings of the district court.