When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 82

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 312

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Date decided Sibbach v. Wilson and Company: 312 U.S. 1: 1941: Gorin v. United States: 312 U.S. 19: 1941: United States v. Cowden Manufacturing Company

  4. Eric Dingwall - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Dingwall

    In his book Critics Dilemma (1966), Dingwall supported Hall's criticism of the spiritualist William Crookes and the medium Florence Cook. [29] [30] He investigated the mediumship of Eusapia Palladino and came to the conclusion she was "vital, vulgar, amorous and a cheat." [31] In 1920, Dingwall with V. J. Woolley tested the medium Eva Carrière in

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 254

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Supreme Court of the United States 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W  /  38.89056°N 77.00444°W  / 38.89056; -77.00444 Established March 4, 1789 ; 235 years ago (1789-03-04) Location Washington, D.C. Coordinates 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W  /  38.89056°N 77.00444°W  / 38.89056; -77.00444 Composition method Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation Authorised by ...

  6. List of United States patent law cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Companion to Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.. United States v. Adams - Supreme Court, 1965. Wet battery including a combination of known elements not obvious because the operating characteristics were unexpected and improved over then-existing wet batteries. Graham v. John Deere Co. - Supreme Court, 1966. Clarified the requirement of ...

  7. United States v. United States Gypsum Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._United...

    United States v. United States Gypsum Co. was a patent–antitrust case in which the United States Supreme Court decided, first, in 1948, [1] that a patent licensing program that fixed prices of many licensees and regimented an entire industry violated the antitrust laws, and then, decided in 1950, [2] after a remand, that appropriate relief in such cases did not extend so far as to permit ...

  8. United States v. United States District Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._United...

    United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972), also known as the Keith Case, was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that upheld, in a unanimous 8-0 ruling, the requirements of the Fourth Amendment in cases of domestic surveillance targeting a domestic threat.

  9. United States v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Washington

    United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), commonly known as the Boldt Decision (from the name of the trial court judge, George Hugo Boldt), was a legal case in 1974 heard in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.