Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Discuss FN SCAR™ 17S and FN SCAR Heavy, SCAR-H ... "SALE Special" SCAR 17 Upper Receiver Enhancement Kit ...
How many SCAR's does FNH manufacture a year? You state that .01% have been replaced, so statistically that puts me at 1000 weapons per 100,000 manufactured were flawed beyond repair and replaced by FN according to your math. That seems like a pretty serious production problem if FN is seeing those kind of failure rates.
A discussion thread on FN Herstal Firearms Home Forums about different optics options for Scar 17 rifles. Users share their preferences, experiences and opinions on various magnification levels, types and brands of optics.
The SCAR 17 & 16 share about ~80% parts commonality. That’s why it’s very easy to change a 17 into a 16. 1. The 17 receiver is longer than the 16. This length is added towards the mid-rear. The front (barrel extension and forward) are the same between the 17 and 16. 2. By extension the, trigger module is longer on the 17.
The SCAR-16 could be good but I don't care I got a few brands in .223 you just can't touch not even FN. That said I love the **** out of FN products but this review is for the SCAR-17 and man let me tell you it is a amazing rifle I love it. Ofcourse, after over a thousand dollars later to fix all the bull**** listed below. CON's: 1.
Sorry for necroing an old thread, but I have been wondering about this since I bought my SCAR 17. If I set the gas regulator to the 10 o'clock (suppressed) position, DON'T use a suppressor, and fire it, does the regulator deliver MORE or LESS gas/force back to my bolt carrier group?
Users share their experiences and opinions on the Tavor 7 and Scar17, two bullpup rifles from FN Herstal. They compare the performance, recoil, accuracy, and suppressor compatibility of the two models.
1. It was a very nice rifle in terms of fit and finish, definitely HK quality throughout. Accuracy seemed very good but I couldn’t say if it was better or worse than my SCAR 17, seemed probably about the same. 2. It is much heavier than the SCAR 17, but when shooting it the recoil is softer than my SCAR 17, most likely due to the added weight. 3.
The SCAR 17 is only about a pound heavier than the 16S is, around 8.5 pounds or so. It is not a benchrest rifle -- it was designed to be a battle rifle from inception, so it was designed to be used as a large caliber assault rifle, essentially.
I'm running the Atlas BT-10 on my Scar 17. It's a good bipod, but it is not as quick to deploy as the Harris. You have to activate each leg individually. Also, (and this problem has been reported a lot by others as well) the panning mechanism (which allows the bipod to swivel left-right) is stiffer than your dick after taking too much viagra ...