Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Data often are missing in research in economics, sociology, and political science because governments or private entities choose not to, or fail to, report critical statistics, [1] or because the information is not available. Sometimes missing values are caused by the researcher—for example, when data collection is done improperly or mistakes ...
Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record. Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit. One form is the appropriation of ...
HARKing (hypothesizing after the results are known) is an acronym coined by social psychologist Norbert Kerr [1] that refers to the questionable research practice of "presenting a post hoc hypothesis in the introduction of a research report as if it were an a priori hypothesis".
In Denmark, scientific misconduct is defined as "intention[al] negligence leading to fabrication of the scientific message or a false credit or emphasis given to a scientist", and in Sweden as "intention[al] distortion of the research process by fabrication of data, text, hypothesis, or methods from another researcher's manuscript form or ...
An outlier is an observation (or subset of observations) which appears to be inconsistent with the remainder of that set of data. [ 3 ] An anomaly is a point or collection of points that is relatively distant from other points in multi-dimensional space of features.
How, then, can data ever be sufficient to prove a theory? This is the " epistemological problem of the indeterminacy of data to theory". The poverty of the stimulus argument and W.V.O. Quine 's 1960 'Gavagai' example are perhaps the most commented variants of the epistemological problem of the indeterminacy of data to theory.
The publication or nonpublication of research findings, depending on the nature and direction of the results. Although medical writers have acknowledged the problem of reporting biases for over a century, [12] it was not until the second half of the 20th century that researchers began to investigate the sources and size of the problem of reporting biases.
When substituting for a data point, it is known as "unit imputation"; when substituting for a component of a data point, it is known as "item imputation". There are three main problems that missing data causes: missing data can introduce a substantial amount of bias , make the handling and analysis of the data more arduous , and create ...